Industry Research

Capital pathways for AI infrastructure

Assessing equity, debt and partnership models enabling hyperscale build‑outs across compute, data and application layers.

Summary

Financing the AI stack

Data center expansion, power procurement and model commercialisation each require different capital structures and risk allocation. We outline instruments and counterparties playing a role in the current cycle.

Compute and facilities

  • Vendor financing and structured leases for GPUs and networking gear.
  • Project‑like SPVs combining offtake with long‑term hosting contracts.
  • Private credit for gap financing; convertibles for growth balance sheets.

Power and sustainability

  • Virtual PPAs and tolling agreements to secure baseload at predictable prices.
  • Hybrid equity for on‑site generation and transmission upgrades.
  • Green financing frameworks aligned with disclosure requirements.
Implications

What this means for operators

Capital intensity and technology cycles demand balanced structures that protect downside while preserving upside participation.

For hyperscalers

Blend long‑dated leases, tax equity and supplier commitments to hedge supply risk while maintaining flexibility across GPU generations.

For emerging platforms

Consider alliances with utilities and real‑estate partners; keep leverage at levels consistent with utilisation ramp and pricing uncertainty.

Back to insights